Choosing an Area & Advisor

Which research area and advisor a student chooses can have a significant impact on their educational experience.

Francesco Bullo, Professor & Department Chair, has compiled a list of suggestions on how to go about choosing a research area and a doctoral advisor. They are inspired by his experiences and by those of other Mechanical Engineering department faculty, and they are adapted from various documents on this subject.

Research Area

Find a broad subject that inspires you and strongly motivates you. You are the best judge of what type of work you like, whether theoretical, numerical and simulation-based, experimental, etc.

Find a subject that resonates with your strengths and interests. Also, as you choose a subject, you are choosing the scientific and engineering community that works on it. These are the people that will judge your work, that you will collaborate with, and that, possibly, you will interview for. Make sure your interests and values are aligned with those of the community you choose to work in.

Most research areas in Mechanical Engineering at UCSB combine scientific elegance with practical impact to greater or lesser degrees. You will want to strike a balance that fits your interests and inclinations. Research areas are in a constant state of flux. New technologies and problems appear; yesterday’s problems are solved and go out of fashion; old problems resurface in new clothes and lead to wonderful new discoveries. Choose a subject that will have relevance in future years.

Doctoral Advisor

Regarding doctoral advisors, before you make any decision, you should be well informed about your advisor’s characteristics and you should develop expectations about your work life during graduate school and beyond.

Technical and Personal Skills

Get to know your prospective advisor from a technical and a personal point of view.

From a technical perspective, your interests should be aligned with the advisor’s technical background and research objectives. Be informed about the research quality and reputation of the prospective advisor; relevant information in this regard includes citations, awards, peer recognition, and publication record of the faculty member.
From a personal perspective, you should be able to establish an effective work relationship and an open and straightforward communication channel with your advisor. Your advisor should be able to provide you with encouragement, motivation, criticism and moral support throughout a long work effort.

Supervision style

Find out how much supervision and direction the prospective advisor will give you, including the frequency and duration of one-on-one meetings and group meetings.
Ask for documents describing the broad area and some of the projects you might be working on. Do not to be overly concerned about the specific problem you will begin your research work with, since that problem might change quickly and will certainly evolve over the duration of a PhD.

Publications and thesis

Find out what the average publication record of former PhD students has been. Read one or two recent theses that have been supervised by this faculty member. This data and an open discussion will help you develop a broad general view for what the advisor’s expectations are. Find out who are the current students working with the advisor and their PhD subjects. Find out when and what conferences current and former students have attended.

Duration and financial support

Find out how long it took former graduate students to complete their PhD theses under the supervision of the prospective advisor. Discuss and develop expectations about what kind of financial support you will be provided with throughout your PhD years.

Career path

You should have clear expectations about what likely career paths will be open for you after graduation. You should know the career paths of the former PhD students of the prospective advisor.